DASHRATHSINH ALIAS PINTUBHAI KANUJI SOMAJI THAKOR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 260/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJMH010007642026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
260/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
260/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206045250245
Police Station
B DIVISION POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DASHRATHSINH ALIAS PINTUBHAI KANUJI SOMAJI THAKOR
Adv. R N BAROT
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court at Mehsana rejected the regular bail application of accused Thakore Dasrathsinh (also known as Pintubha) filed under Section 483 of the CrPC. The court found that serious charges under IPC Sections 103(1), 61(2), 54, and GP Act Section 135 were substantiated—involving a pre-planned murder where the accused allegedly attacked the complainant's brother with an iron rod, causing fatal injuries. Since trial proceedings had already commenced with several witnesses examined, and no significant new circumstances had emerged since the previous bail rejection, granting successive bail was unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court at Mehsana rejected the regular bail application of accused Thakore Dasrathsinh (also known as Pintubha) filed under Section 483 of the CrPC. The court found that serious charges under IPC Sections 103(1), 61(2), 54, and GP Act Section 135 were substantiated—involving a pre-planned murder where the accused allegedly attacked the complainant's brother with an iron rod, causing fatal injuries. Since trial proceedings had already commenced with several witnesses examined, and no significant new circumstances had emerged since the previous bail rejection, granting successive bail was unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts