DASHRATHSINH ALIAS PINTUBHAI KANUJI SOMAJI THAKOR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 260/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJMH010007642026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

260/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

260/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206045250245

Police Station

B DIVISION POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 103(1),61(2),54,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135,

Petitioner(s)

DASHRATHSINH ALIAS PINTUBHAI KANUJI SOMAJI THAKOR

Adv. R N BAROT

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Sessions Court at Mehsana rejected the regular bail application of accused Thakore Dasrathsinh (also known as Pintubha) filed under Section 483 of the CrPC. The court found that serious charges under IPC Sections 103(1), 61(2), 54, and GP Act Section 135 were substantiated—involving a pre-planned murder where the accused allegedly attacked the complainant's brother with an iron rod, causing fatal injuries. Since trial proceedings had already commenced with several witnesses examined, and no significant new circumstances had emerged since the previous bail rejection, granting successive bail was unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court at Mehsana rejected the regular bail application of accused Thakore Dasrathsinh (also known as Pintubha) filed under Section 483 of the CrPC. The court found that serious charges under IPC Sections 103(1), 61(2), 54, and GP Act Section 135 were substantiated—involving a pre-planned murder where the accused allegedly attacked the complainant's brother with an iron rod, causing fatal injuries. Since trial proceedings had already commenced with several witnesses examined, and no significant new circumstances had emerged since the previous bail rejection, granting successive bail was unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case