JITENDRAKUMAR SATYANARAYAN SONI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 3/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
GPID CRMA - GPID Criminal Misc. Appl.
CNR: GJMH010007622026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206073210826
Police Station
VADNAGAR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JITENDRAKUMAR SATYANARAYAN SONI
Adv. G K BAROT
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Mehsana Sessions Court rejected the regular bail application of accused Soni Jitendrakumar Satyanarayan in a case involving charges of cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC sections 406, 420, 114, and GPIA section 3. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in defrauding complainants of approximately ₹2,11,50,000 through an investment scheme via Cheher Enterprises, with substantial bank transaction records corroborating the prosecution's case. Considering the gravity of the offense, the accused's active role, and the quantum of fraud involved, the court deemed regular bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Mehsana Sessions Court rejected the regular bail application of accused Soni Jitendrakumar Satyanarayan in a case involving charges of cheating and criminal breach of trust under IPC sections 406, 420, 114, and GPIA section 3. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in defrauding complainants of approximately ₹2,11,50,000 through an investment scheme via Cheher Enterprises, with substantial bank transaction records corroborating the prosecution's case. Considering the gravity of the offense, the accused's active role, and the quantum of fraud involved, the court deemed regular bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts