ZALA LALSINH DHIRUBHA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 258/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJMH010007572026

Filing Number

258/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

258/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),118(2),351(3),352,54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ZALA LALSINH DHIRUBHA

    Adv. S K BAROT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court granted regular bail to the accused Jhala Lalsingh on March 9, 2026, under BNS Section 483, imposing strict conditions including a bond of ₹25,000, monthly police reporting, travel restrictions within Gujarat, and a 6-month prohibition from entering Santhal village. The court found insufficient evidence of the accused being a flight risk or danger to society, noting the case involved a civil/family dispute wrongly characterized as criminal and that no complainant required critical hospitalization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 258/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court granted regular bail to the accused Jhala Lalsingh on March 9, 2026, under BNS Section 483, imposing strict conditions including a bond of ₹25,000, monthly police reporting, travel restrictions within Gujarat, and a 6-month prohibition from entering Santhal village. The court found insufficient evidence of the accused being a flight risk or danger to society, noting the case involved a civil/family dispute wrongly characterized as criminal and that no complainant required critical hospitalization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case