ZALA LALSINH DHIRUBHA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 258/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJMH010007572026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

258/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

258/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 115(2),118(2),351(3),352,54,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135,

Petitioner(s)

ZALA LALSINH DHIRUBHA

Adv. S K BAROT

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE

Hearing History

Judge: 4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDER

06-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court granted regular bail to the accused Jhala Lalsingh on March 9, 2026, under BNS Section 483, imposing strict conditions including a bond of ₹25,000, monthly police reporting, travel restrictions within Gujarat, and a 6-month prohibition from entering Santhal village. The court found insufficient evidence of the accused being a flight risk or danger to society, noting the case involved a civil/family dispute wrongly characterized as criminal and that no complainant required critical hospitalization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court granted regular bail to the accused Jhala Lalsingh on March 9, 2026, under BNS Section 483, imposing strict conditions including a bond of ₹25,000, monthly police reporting, travel restrictions within Gujarat, and a 6-month prohibition from entering Santhal village. The court found insufficient evidence of the accused being a flight risk or danger to society, noting the case involved a civil/family dispute wrongly characterized as criminal and that no complainant required critical hospitalization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case