THAKOR ASHOKJI GABHAJI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 257/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJMH010007562026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
257/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
257/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206020260083
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THAKOR ASHOKJI GABHAJI
Adv. B B SARODE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Ashok Thakore under BNS 2023 sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2)-(3), 324(4), 329(3), 351(3), and 352, related to a violent incident at a wedding ceremony in Kadi. The court found that the accused and co-accused purchased weapons and committed a planned violent assault causing serious injuries, demonstrating premeditated criminal intent and a violent tendency that warranted police custodial interrogation. Additionally, previously granted bail to other accused in similar cases was violated as they failed to appear before police as mandated, raising concerns about the current accused's reliability and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Ashok Thakore under BNS 2023 sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2)-(3), 324(4), 329(3), 351(3), and 352, related to a violent incident at a wedding ceremony in Kadi. The court found that the accused and co-accused purchased weapons and committed a planned violent assault causing serious injuries, demonstrating premeditated criminal intent and a violent tendency that warranted police custodial interrogation. Additionally, previously granted bail to other accused in similar cases was violated as they failed to appear before police as mandated, raising concerns about the current accused's reliability and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts