THAKOR ASHOKJI GABHAJI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 257/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJMH010007562026
Filing Number
257/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
257/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
4-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206020260083
Police Station
KADI POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THAKOR ASHOKJI GABHAJI
Adv. B B SARODE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Ashok Thakore under BNS 2023 sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2)-(3), 324(4), 329(3), 351(3), and 352, related to a violent incident at a wedding ceremony in Kadi. The court found that the accused and co-accused purchased weapons and committed a planned violent assault causing serious injuries, demonstrating premeditated criminal intent and a violent tendency that warranted police custodial interrogation. Additionally, previously granted bail to other accused in similar cases was violated as they failed to appear before police as mandated, raising concerns about the current accused's reliability and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
2nd Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 257/2026
Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Ashok Thakore under BNS 2023 sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2)-(3), 324(4), 329(3), 351(3), and 352, related to a violent incident at a wedding ceremony in Kadi. The court found that the accused and co-accused purchased weapons and committed a planned violent assault causing serious injuries, demonstrating premeditated criminal intent and a violent tendency that warranted police custodial interrogation. Additionally, previously granted bail to other accused in similar cases was violated as they failed to appear before police as mandated, raising concerns about the current accused's reliability and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts