PARMAR RAJVIR VIPULBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 256/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJMH010007552026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
256/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
256/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206045260144
Police Station
B DIVISION POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARMAR RAJVIR VIPULBHAI
Adv. S N META
PARMAR MEET ALIAS MITRAJ BHARATBHAI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court rejected the bail application of two accused under IPC Sections 110(1) and 54, finding prima facie evidence of attempted murder. The court determined that the accused conspired with the complainant's wife to steal her jewelry and attempted to run over the complainant with a truck, causing grievous injuries. The court found the circumstances and police investigation records sufficient to warrant custodial interrogation and denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court rejected the bail application of two accused under IPC Sections 110(1) and 54, finding prima facie evidence of attempted murder. The court determined that the accused conspired with the complainant's wife to steal her jewelry and attempted to run over the complainant with a truck, causing grievous injuries. The court found the circumstances and police investigation records sufficient to warrant custodial interrogation and denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts