PARMAR RAJVIR VIPULBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE — 256/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJMH010007552026

Filing Number

256/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

256/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206045260144

Police Station

B DIVISION POLICE STATION - MAHESANA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 110,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR RAJVIR VIPULBHAI

    Adv. S N META

  2. 2.PARMAR MEET ALIAS MITRAJ BHARATBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P K DAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court rejected the bail application of two accused under IPC Sections 110(1) and 54, finding prima facie evidence of attempted murder. The court determined that the accused conspired with the complainant's wife to steal her jewelry and attempted to run over the complainant with a truck, causing grievous injuries. The court found the circumstances and police investigation records sufficient to warrant custodial interrogation and denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 256/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Mehsana Additional Sessions Court rejected the bail application of two accused under IPC Sections 110(1) and 54, finding prima facie evidence of attempted murder. The court determined that the accused conspired with the complainant's wife to steal her jewelry and attempted to run over the complainant with a truck, causing grievous injuries. The court found the circumstances and police investigation records sufficient to warrant custodial interrogation and denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case