THAKOR PRATAPJI GANPATJI vs Patel Jayeshbhai Mulchandbhai as Power of Attorney of Shalibhadra Finance Ltd. Advocate - H A GADHVI — 93/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010007132026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

93/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

93/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

THAKOR PRATAPJI GANPATJI

Adv. M S THAKOR

Respondent(s)

Patel Jayeshbhai Mulchandbhai as Power of Attorney of Shalibhadra Finance Ltd. Advocate - H A GADHVI

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. A S MAKWANA

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

27-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court allowed the appellant's appeal and acquitted him of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act after the appellant and complainant reached an amicable settlement during appeal proceedings. Relying on Section 147 of the NI Act (which makes offences compoundable) and Supreme Court precedents, the court set aside the trial court's conviction and sentence of 1.5 years imprisonment, disposing the matter through Lok Adalat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the appellant's appeal and acquitted him of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act after the appellant and complainant reached an amicable settlement during appeal proceedings. Relying on Section 147 of the NI Act (which makes offences compoundable) and Supreme Court precedents, the court set aside the trial court's conviction and sentence of 1.5 years imprisonment, disposing the matter through Lok Adalat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case