PACHANBHAI VIRABHAI DABHI vs HARDIK SUNILKUMAR THAKAR-H D F C BANK LTD. Advocate - J P TRIVEDI — 45/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010003852026

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

6-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PACHANBHAI VIRABHAI DABHI

    Adv. S J PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARDIK SUNILKUMAR THAKAR-H D F C BANK LTD. Advocate - J P TRIVEDI

  2. 2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. A S MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahesana allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted appellant Pachanbhai Virabhai Dabhi of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, citing a settlement reached between the parties. The court relied on Section 147 of the NI Act (making offenses compoundable) and Supreme Court precedents to set aside the trial court's conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, provided the appellant complies with agreed settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahesana allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted appellant Pachanbhai Virabhai Dabhi of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, citing a settlement reached between the parties. The court relied on Section 147 of the NI Act (making offenses compoundable) and Supreme Court precedents to set aside the trial court's conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, provided the appellant complies with agreed settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case