PACHANBHAI VIRABHAI DABHI vs HARDIK SUNILKUMAR THAKAR-H D F C BANK LTD. Advocate - J P TRIVEDI — 45/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3),. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010003852026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

31-01-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415(3),
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

PACHANBHAI VIRABHAI DABHI

Adv. S J PATEL

Respondent(s)

HARDIK SUNILKUMAR THAKAR-H D F C BANK LTD. Advocate - J P TRIVEDI

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. A S MAKWANA

Hearing History

Judge: 6-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

03-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

03-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahesana allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted appellant Pachanbhai Virabhai Dabhi of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, citing a settlement reached between the parties. The court relied on Section 147 of the NI Act (making offenses compoundable) and Supreme Court precedents to set aside the trial court's conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, provided the appellant complies with agreed settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 6th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mahesana allowed the criminal appeal and acquitted appellant Pachanbhai Virabhai Dabhi of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, citing a settlement reached between the parties. The court relied on Section 147 of the NI Act (making offenses compoundable) and Supreme Court precedents to set aside the trial court's conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, provided the appellant complies with agreed settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case