PINKALBEN KALPESHSINH CHAUHAN vs DGP SHRI — 77/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJMH010003452026
Filing Number
77/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
77/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
5-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PINKALBEN KALPESHSINH CHAUHAN
Adv. L H RANA
-
2.MINOR TEJSHRIBEN KAPESHSINH CHAUHAN HER LEGAL GUARDIAN PINKALBEN KALPESHSINH CHAUHAN
-
3.AMARBA JASHVANTSINH CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.DGP SHRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Mahesana allowed the applicant's application to file a motor accident compensation claim as an indigent person under Order 33 of the CPC, finding prima facie that the applicant lacks sufficient means to pay court fees. The court permitted the applicant to proceed in forma pauperies (in-forma pauper) and registered the main claim petition, issuing notice to the opponents in accordance with principles established in Ramabhai v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2026
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Mahesana allowed the applicant's application to file a motor accident compensation claim as an indigent person under Order 33 of the CPC, finding prima facie that the applicant lacks sufficient means to pay court fees. The court permitted the applicant to proceed in forma pauperies (in-forma pauper) and registered the main claim petition, issuing notice to the opponents in accordance with principles established in Ramabhai v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts