SOHANA IMRANBHAI MODAN D/O. USMANGANI DALA AND POA OF ZEBA IMRANBHAI MODAN vs MODAN IMRANBHAI DAJIBHAI MODAN — 6/2019
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 09th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJMH010003132019
Filing Number
6/2019
Filing Date
25-Jan-2019
Registration No
6/2019
Registration Date
25-Jan-2019
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
6-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOHANA IMRANBHAI MODAN D/O. USMANGANI DALA AND POA OF ZEBA IMRANBHAI MODAN
Adv. R.M.VYAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.MODAN IMRANBHAI DAJIBHAI MODAN
-
2.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. A.S.MAKWANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge Court in Mahesana dismissed a criminal revision petition filed under CrPC Section 397 on March 9, 2026. The petitioner sought to challenge a lower court order that directed the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 1,500 to the petitioner and Rs. 700 for the minor daughter. The court rejected the revision primarily because the respondent could not be properly served with notice despite multiple attempts, the petitioner failed to provide a complete address, and the petitioner showed persistent non-appearance in court proceedings over seven years, making it impossible to proceed fairly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Urgent Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Urgent Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
01-Oct-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
05-Jun-2025
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
07-May-2025
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
27-Feb-2025
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Oct-2024
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
31-Aug-2024
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
09-May-2024
Process To Respondents
3rd Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Process To Respondents
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Process To Respondents
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Process To Respondents
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Jan-2024
Process To Respondents
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Process To Respondents
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Nov-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Sep-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
31-Jul-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jul-2023
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-May-2023
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
26-Apr-2023
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
14-Mar-2023
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jan-2023
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
29-Dec-2022
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
14-Dec-2022
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
22-Nov-2022
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
02-Nov-2022
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-Sep-2022
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
08-Jul-2022
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
05-May-2022
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Feb-2022
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
24-Dec-2021
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
30-Oct-2021
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
17-Sep-2021
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
06-Aug-2021
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
05-Jul-2021
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
27-May-2021
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
15-Apr-2021
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
19-Feb-2021
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
05-Jan-2021
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Nov-2020
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2020
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
05-Aug-2020
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
22-May-2020
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
08-May-2020
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
08-Apr-2020
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
03-Mar-2020
Process To Respondents
6th Addl District Judge
-
22-Jan-2020
Final Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2019
Final Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
18-Oct-2019
Final Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
11-Sep-2019
Final Hearing
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Sep-2019
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
26-Jul-2019
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
03-Jun-2019
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2019
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2019
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jan-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2019
The Additional Sessions Judge Court in Mahesana dismissed a criminal revision petition filed under CrPC Section 397 on March 9, 2026. The petitioner sought to challenge a lower court order that directed the respondent to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 1,500 to the petitioner and Rs. 700 for the minor daughter. The court rejected the revision primarily because the respondent could not be properly served with notice despite multiple attempts, the petitioner failed to provide a complete address, and the petitioner showed persistent non-appearance in court proceedings over seven years, making it impossible to proceed fairly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts