DINESHBHAI NARSINGBHAI PATEL vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - B G PATEL — 36/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010002982026

Filing Number

36/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

36/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI NARSINGBHAI PATEL

    Adv. P C CHAVDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - B G PATEL

  2. 2.KALPESH R RAJGOR-SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. H B PRAJAPATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge of Mahesana dismissed the appeal and confirmed the conviction of Dineshbhai Patel under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that Patel obtained a ₹4,00,000 business loan from Shri Ram Finance Ltd., issued a cheque for ₹3,00,000 for final settlement, which was dishonored due to "Account Closed," and failed to respond to a legal demand notice. The court upheld the one-year imprisonment sentence and ₹3,00,000 compensation order, finding all statutory requirements satisfied and the accused's failure to mount any defense conclusive of guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    For R&P

    Principal District Judge

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge of Mahesana dismissed the appeal and confirmed the conviction of Dineshbhai Patel under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that Patel obtained a ₹4,00,000 business loan from Shri Ram Finance Ltd., issued a cheque for ₹3,00,000 for final settlement, which was dishonored due to "Account Closed," and failed to respond to a legal demand notice. The court upheld the one-year imprisonment sentence and ₹3,00,000 compensation order, finding all statutory requirements satisfied and the accused's failure to mount any defense conclusive of guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case