THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR VIJAY VINODBHAI DEVAJIBHAI Advocate - R M JANI — 4/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1),54,238,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th April 2026.

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJMH010001852026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

16-01-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11206074250604

Police Station

VIJAPUR POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1),54,238,
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 4(2),5(L),6,8,12,17,

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. P K DAVE

Respondent(s)

THAKOR VIJAY VINODBHAI DEVAJIBHAI Advocate - R M JANI

THAKOR VINODJI DEVUJI VIHAJI

Adv. R M JANI

JYOTSNABEN VINODJI DEVUJI THAKOR

Adv. R M JANI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

27-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

25-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

18-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

13-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

JUDGMENT SUMMARY The Special PCSO Court in Mehsana acquitted three accused (Thakori Vijaya, Thakori Vinaadaji, and Jyotsanaben) in a child sexual abuse case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of corroborating medical evidence. The court imposed a fine of ₹5,000 on the accused with six months judicial custody as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

JUDGMENT SUMMARY The Special PCSO Court in Mehsana acquitted three accused (Thakori Vijaya, Thakori Vinaadaji, and Jyotsanaben) in a child sexual abuse case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of corroborating medical evidence. The court imposed a fine of ₹5,000 on the accused with six months judicial custody as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case