SOLANKI MANZILKUMAR RATILAL vs RATHOD RAJESHKUMAR PRAVINBHAI Advocate - J S OJHA — 19/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJMH010001772026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

19/2026

Filing Date

15-01-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

15-01-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

SOLANKI MANZILKUMAR RATILAL

Adv. A A YADAV

Respondent(s)

RATHOD RAJESHKUMAR PRAVINBHAI Advocate - J S OJHA

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. B G PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

05-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

25-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court confirmed the trial court's findings that the accused obtained a ₹2,00,000 hand loan, issued a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds, and failed to make payment despite receiving a legal demand notice. The court upheld the conviction and sentence of one-year imprisonment with ₹2,00,000 compensation, noting the accused deliberately absented himself from trial proceedings despite ample opportunities to cross-examine the complainant and present his defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court confirmed the trial court's findings that the accused obtained a ₹2,00,000 hand loan, issued a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds, and failed to make payment despite receiving a legal demand notice. The court upheld the conviction and sentence of one-year imprisonment with ₹2,00,000 compensation, noting the accused deliberately absented himself from trial proceedings despite ample opportunities to cross-examine the complainant and present his defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case