THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DALARAM S/O JODHAJI NAGAJI MAJIRANA(BHIL) Advocate - J L THAKOR — 2/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO

CNR: GJMH010001442026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA

Judge

4-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 21-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4(2),5(L),6,8,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. P K DAVE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DALARAM S/O JODHAJI NAGAJI MAJIRANA(BHIL) Advocate - J L THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted the accused in this child abuse case. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(a), 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4(2), 5(l), 6, 8, 12. While the victim's testimony and medical evidence suggested some physical contact, the court determined insufficient corroboration and credible evidence to establish the specific allegations of rape and sexual assault, leading to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  13. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    2nd Addl District Judge

  15. 21-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl District Judge

  16. 20-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl District Judge

  17. 17-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl District Judge

  18. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused in this child abuse case. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(a), 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4(2), 5(l), 6, 8, 12. While the victim's testimony and medical evidence suggested some physical contact, the court determined insufficient corroboration and credible evidence to establish the specific allegations of rape and sexual assault, leading to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case