THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR SURESHJI ALIAS KARAN S/O HARIJI ALIAS KADAJI RAYSANGJI Advocate - F D JOSHI — 1/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),65(1),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJMH010001192026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
09-01-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT MAHESANA
Judge
5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11206005250521
Police Station
BAVLU POLICE STATION- MEHSANA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. R K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
THAKOR SURESHJI ALIAS KARAN S/O HARIJI ALIAS KADAJI RAYSANGJI Advocate - F D JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary In this POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act case from Mahesana, Gujarat, the Special Judge acquitted the accused, Thakor Sureshji (age 24), of charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M), 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 4(2), 5(L), 6, 8, 12. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of kidnapping and rape of a 14-year-old girl beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony was inconsistent and lacked corroborating medical or forensic evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary In this POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act case from Mahesana, Gujarat, the Special Judge acquitted the accused, Thakor Sureshji (age 24), of charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M), 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 4(2), 5(L), 6, 8, 12. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of kidnapping and rape of a 14-year-old girl beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony was inconsistent and lacked corroborating medical or forensic evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts