Shardaben Urfe Kokilaben Kanubhai Damor vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 42/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJLV060004402026

Filing Number

40/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BALASINOR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11187011260026

Police Station

BALASINOR TALUKA POLICE STATION - MAHISAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shardaben Urfe Kokilaben Kanubhai Damor

    Adv. K C PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 42/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Shardaben Urfe Kokilaben Kanubhai Damor, accused under IPC Sections 318(4) and 54 (cheating/fraud in marriage), was rejected. The court found a prima facie case existed based on available records and considered the nature and gravity of the offense, the accused's status as a habitual offender, and societal impact per Supreme Court precedent (Virupakshappa Gouda case), making bail denial appropriate despite the accused being female and the chargesheet being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 42/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Shardaben Urfe Kokilaben Kanubhai Damor, accused under IPC Sections 318(4) and 54 (cheating/fraud in marriage), was rejected. The court found a prima facie case existed based on available records and considered the nature and gravity of the offense, the accused's status as a habitual offender, and societal impact per Supreme Court precedent (Virupakshappa Gouda case), making bail denial appropriate despite the accused being female and the chargesheet being filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case