Government of Gujarat vs LAKHAJI GEMAJI VANJARA Advocate - P J PUVAR — 1144/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJLV030012762025
Filing Number
1144/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
1144/2025
Registration Date
26-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KADANA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11187003250146
Police Station
DITWAS POLICE STATION - MAHISAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAKHAJI GEMAJI VANJARA Advocate - P J PUVAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case 1144/2025 Summary The court acquitted the accused (Lakhaji Gemaji Vanjara) of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(a)(b) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution could not establish credible evidence regarding the vehicle involved, the driver's identity, or the circumstances of the alleged offense, as both key witnesses provided inconsistent statements lacking corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1144/2025
Case 1144/2025 Summary The court acquitted the accused (Lakhaji Gemaji Vanjara) of charges under IPC Sections 281, 125(a)(b) and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution could not establish credible evidence regarding the vehicle involved, the driver's identity, or the circumstances of the alleged offense, as both key witnesses provided inconsistent statements lacking corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts