KALPANABEN D/O BHURABHAI FATABHAI HARIJAN W/O KALUBHAI RAMESHBHAI HARIJAN vs KALUBHAI RAMESHBHAI HARIJAN Advocate - R C SHARMA — 33/2025

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC.APPLICATION -JMFC

CNR: GJLV030006002025

Filing Number

33/2025

Filing Date

26-Jun-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

26-Jun-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KADANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALPANABEN D/O BHURABHAI FATABHAI HARIJAN W/O KALUBHAI RAMESHBHAI HARIJAN

    Adv. R P PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALUBHAI RAMESHBHAI HARIJAN Advocate - R C SHARMA

  2. 2.RAMESHBHAI HIRABHAI HARIJAN

  3. 3.MANJULABEN RAMESHBHAI HARIJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.A. 33/2025 Court Decision: The court partially granted the petitioner Kalpanaben's plea, holding that the respondent Kalubhai and in-laws committed domestic violence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court awarded maintenance, protection orders, and monetary compensation to the petitioner and her child while rejecting certain claims due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 08-Oct-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 22-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 09-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 28-Aug-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 25-Aug-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 07-Aug-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 28-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 17-Jul-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 09-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 26-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.A. 33/2025 Court Decision: The court partially granted the petitioner Kalpanaben's plea, holding that the respondent Kalubhai and in-laws committed domestic violence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court awarded maintenance, protection orders, and monetary compensation to the petitioner and her child while rejecting certain claims due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case