HASMUKHLAL CHANDULAL DOSHI vs TRUSTEE OF SAIFI HOSPITAL AND NURSING HOME Advocate - H A MOJANIDAR — 190/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 02-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJLV020024222024

Filing Number

191/2024

Filing Date

12-Sep-2024

Registration No

190/2024

Registration Date

12-Sep-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HASMUKHLAL CHANDULAL DOSHI

    Adv. J A PATHAK

  2. 2.IMTIYAZ ABDUL MAJID MALVANIYA

    Adv. J A PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TRUSTEE OF SAIFI HOSPITAL AND NURSING HOME Advocate - H A MOJANIDAR

  2. 2.JOHARBHAI YUSUFBHAI DIVANJI

    Adv. H A MOJANIDAR

  3. 3.ABDEALIBHAI ROSHANALI LIMDIYAVALA

    Adv. H A MOJANIDAR

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 24-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 19-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 08-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 17-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 27-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 20-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction to restrain defendants from interrupting their possession of shop properties in Lunawada. The Additional Civil Judge found that since a parallel land grabbing complaint under the Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act had been registered against the plaintiffs, the civil court should not exercise interim relief jurisdiction that would defeat the special statute's provisions. The judge concluded the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 20-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 27-Feb-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 06-Feb-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 18-Jan-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 31-Dec-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 19-Dec-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 12-Dec-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 04-Dec-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 28-Nov-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 21-Nov-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 11-Nov-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 07-Nov-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 28-Oct-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 24-Oct-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 19-Oct-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 10-Oct-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 26-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 12-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 190/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction to restrain defendants from interrupting their possession of shop properties in Lunawada. The Additional Civil Judge found that since a parallel land grabbing complaint under the Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act had been registered against the plaintiffs, the civil court should not exercise interim relief jurisdiction that would defeat the special statute's provisions. The judge concluded the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case