KHANT RAMESHBHAI SOMABHAI L/H OF SOMABHAI BHIMABHAI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 22/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 06th May 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJLV020006872020
Filing Number
42/2020
Filing Date
20-Jul-2020
Registration No
22/2024
Registration Date
20-Jul-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KHANT RAMESHBHAI SOMABHAI L/H OF SOMABHAI BHIMABHAI
Adv. S.H.MEHTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
-
2.DISTRICT FOREST OFFICER
Adv. AGP
-
3.R.F.O
Adv. AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: SPCS No. 22/2024 Court Decision: The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims that he possessed adverse possession rights over forest reserve land and is entitled to ownership. The court ruled against the petitioner on all material issues. Key Reasoning: The disputed land is declared forest reserve under the Indian Forest Act 1927, which prohibits transferring such land without government sanction. The petitioner failed to prove continuous, uninterrupted adverse possession since before 1971. Additionally, the petition was filed beyond the statutory limitation period, and the Forest Department's prior actions—collecting unauthorized cultivation penalties—contradicted any claim of legitimate adverse possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
01-May-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Apr-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
10-Mar-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Feb-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Dec-2024
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Defendant Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
19-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Jun-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
20-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Apr-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Mar-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Feb-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jan-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Jan-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Nov-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Oct-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Oct-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Sep-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Sep-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Aug-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jul-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Jul-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Jun-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-May-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Apr-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-Mar-2023
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Feb-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Jan-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Jan-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Dec-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Nov-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Oct-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Sep-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Sep-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
28-Jul-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Jul-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Jun-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-May-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Apr-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Mar-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Feb-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Jan-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Jan-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Dec-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Nov-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Nov-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Oct-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Sep-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Aug-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Aug-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jul-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Jun-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-May-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Apr-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Mar-2021
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Feb-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Jan-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Dec-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
26-Nov-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Oct-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Sep-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Sep-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Aug-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jul-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2024
Case Summary: SPCS No. 22/2024 Court Decision: The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims that he possessed adverse possession rights over forest reserve land and is entitled to ownership. The court ruled against the petitioner on all material issues. Key Reasoning: The disputed land is declared forest reserve under the Indian Forest Act 1927, which prohibits transferring such land without government sanction. The petitioner failed to prove continuous, uninterrupted adverse possession since before 1971. Additionally, the petition was filed beyond the statutory limitation period, and the Forest Department's prior actions—collecting unauthorized cultivation penalties—contradicted any claim of legitimate adverse possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts