Government of Gujarat vs BHUPENDRABHAI MANGALSINH BARIA Advocate - D S PATEL — 233/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJLV020003552026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
233/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHUPENDRABHAI MANGALSINH BARIA Advocate - D S PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. While illegal liquor (2 liters of country-made alcohol worth Rs. 400) was recovered from the accused's house during a police raid on December 31, 2025, the court held that the panchnama (official record) lacked credible witness testimony and contained procedural defects that undermined the evidence's reliability. The court reasoned that without proper corroboration and given the absence of any prior criminal record, the benefit of doubt should go to the accused under the principles of criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. While illegal liquor (2 liters of country-made alcohol worth Rs. 400) was recovered from the accused's house during a police raid on December 31, 2025, the court held that the panchnama (official record) lacked credible witness testimony and contained procedural defects that undermined the evidence's reliability. The court reasoned that without proper corroboration and given the absence of any prior criminal record, the benefit of doubt should go to the accused under the principles of criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts