Government of Gujarat vs PRATAPBHAI ABHABHAI PAGI Advocate - D S PATEL — 232/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJLV020003542026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
232/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
232/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRATAPBHAI ABHABHAI PAGI Advocate - D S PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence that the accused possessed country liquor without a valid permit at their residence. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case, as the sole witness (a police witness) could not be corroborated and critical procedural requirements regarding witness examination were not properly fulfilled, making the conviction unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence that the accused possessed country liquor without a valid permit at their residence. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case, as the sole witness (a police witness) could not be corroborated and critical procedural requirements regarding witness examination were not properly fulfilled, making the conviction unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts