Government of Gujarat vs REVABEN RAISINGBHAI FULABHAI PAGI Advocate - D S PATEL — 231/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020003532026

Filing Number

231/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

231/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REVABEN RAISINGBHAI FULABHAI PAGI Advocate - D S PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Court Judgment C.C.No.231/2026 The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65, finding insufficient evidence to prove the illegal possession of foreign liquor (0.02 liters of Rs. 400 value) recovered from the accused's home during a police raid. The court concluded that since the five witnesses (panchas) to the search denied knowledge of the proceedings and the police investigation lacked corroborating testimony, the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, warranting the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 231/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Judgment C.C.No.231/2026 The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65, finding insufficient evidence to prove the illegal possession of foreign liquor (0.02 liters of Rs. 400 value) recovered from the accused's home during a police raid. The court concluded that since the five witnesses (panchas) to the search denied knowledge of the proceedings and the police investigation lacked corroborating testimony, the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, warranting the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case