Government of Gujarat vs SHANTABEN DAHYABHAI BARIA Advocate - D B SHRIMALI — 230/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020003522026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

230/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

230/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SHANTABEN DAHYABHAI BARIA Advocate - D B SHRIMALI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

26-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, and Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that despite recovery of country liquor from the accused's residence during a police raid, the evidence was insufficient due to lack of proper witness testimony and procedural deficiencies in the investigation, particularly regarding the mandatory presence of independent witnesses during the search and seizure operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, and Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that despite recovery of country liquor from the accused's residence during a police raid, the evidence was insufficient due to lack of proper witness testimony and procedural deficiencies in the investigation, particularly regarding the mandatory presence of independent witnesses during the search and seizure operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case