Government of Gujarat vs SHANTABEN DAHYABHAI BARIA Advocate - D B SHRIMALI — 230/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJLV020003522026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
230/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
230/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHANTABEN DAHYABHAI BARIA Advocate - D B SHRIMALI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 26-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, and Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that despite recovery of country liquor from the accused's residence during a police raid, the evidence was insufficient due to lack of proper witness testimony and procedural deficiencies in the investigation, particularly regarding the mandatory presence of independent witnesses during the search and seizure operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, and Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that despite recovery of country liquor from the accused's residence during a police raid, the evidence was insufficient due to lack of proper witness testimony and procedural deficiencies in the investigation, particularly regarding the mandatory presence of independent witnesses during the search and seizure operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts