Government of Gujarat vs NANDABEN GULABSINH DADUSINH BARIA — 200/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020003152026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

200/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NANDABEN GULABSINH DADUSINH BARIA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

24-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case of illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court held that while contraband was recovered from the accused's residence without proper authorization, the panchanama (witness record) lacked credibility as the witnesses did not verify the evidence, and the police investigation was procedurally deficient, making the case legally insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case of illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court held that while contraband was recovered from the accused's residence without proper authorization, the panchanama (witness record) lacked credibility as the witnesses did not verify the evidence, and the police investigation was procedurally deficient, making the case legally insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case