Government of Gujarat vs KALUBHAI KANUBHAI PAGI — 199/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020003142026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

199/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

199/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KALUBHAI KANUBHAI PAGI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

24-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65) for illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found that the prosecution's case relied on the testimonies of five witnesses whose credibility was questionable, as they were not properly identified in the panchnama (official record) and their signatures could not be verified. Since the police investigation lacked corroborating evidence and proper procedure, the court ruled there was insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65) for illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found that the prosecution's case relied on the testimonies of five witnesses whose credibility was questionable, as they were not properly identified in the panchnama (official record) and their signatures could not be verified. Since the police investigation lacked corroborating evidence and proper procedure, the court ruled there was insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case