Government of Gujarat vs KALUBHAI KANUBHAI PAGI — 199/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJLV020003142026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
199/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
199/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KALUBHAI KANUBHAI PAGI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 24-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65) for illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found that the prosecution's case relied on the testimonies of five witnesses whose credibility was questionable, as they were not properly identified in the panchnama (official record) and their signatures could not be verified. Since the police investigation lacked corroborating evidence and proper procedure, the court ruled there was insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65) for illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found that the prosecution's case relied on the testimonies of five witnesses whose credibility was questionable, as they were not properly identified in the panchnama (official record) and their signatures could not be verified. Since the police investigation lacked corroborating evidence and proper procedure, the court ruled there was insufficient proof beyond reasonable doubt to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts