Government of Gujarat vs REVABEN AMRABHAI JESINGBHAI PAGI — 197/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020003122026

Filing Number

197/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

197/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REVABEN AMRABHAI JESINGBHAI PAGI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Excise Act, 1949, Section 65, finding insufficient evidence of illegal possession of contraband alcohol. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case as the required witnesses (panchas) were not properly identified and their testimony was unreliable, and the police investigation lacked proper procedure and corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 197/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Excise Act, 1949, Section 65, finding insufficient evidence of illegal possession of contraband alcohol. The prosecution failed to establish a credible case as the required witnesses (panchas) were not properly identified and their testimony was unreliable, and the police investigation lacked proper procedure and corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case