Government of Gujarat vs RAGHABHAI DAYABHAI KHANT — 195/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020003052026

Filing Number

195/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAGHABHAI DAYABHAI KHANT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted the accused under Indian Penal Code Section 271 and Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65, finding insufficient evidence that the defendant possessed foreign liquor illegally in his house. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as critical witness testimonies were unreliable and the investigating officer's evidence was compromised by procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused under Indian Penal Code Section 271 and Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65, finding insufficient evidence that the defendant possessed foreign liquor illegally in his house. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as critical witness testimonies were unreliable and the investigating officer's evidence was compromised by procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case