Government of Gujarat vs BALVANTBHAI MAGANBHAI BARIA Advocate - J H THAKOR — 190/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJLV020003002026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
190/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
190/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BALVANTBHAI MAGANBHAI BARIA Advocate - J H THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 IPC and Section 65 of the Gujarat Excise Act, 1949, finding the prosecution's case against them unsustainable. The accused was charged with illegal possession of foreign liquor (0.3 liters of Indian-made foreign liquor worth Rs. 600) discovered during a police raid at their residence, but the court determined that the evidence and witness testimonies presented by the prosecution were insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 IPC and Section 65 of the Gujarat Excise Act, 1949, finding the prosecution's case against them unsustainable. The accused was charged with illegal possession of foreign liquor (0.3 liters of Indian-made foreign liquor worth Rs. 600) discovered during a police raid at their residence, but the court determined that the evidence and witness testimonies presented by the prosecution were insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts