Government of Gujarat vs RAYLIBEN SOMABHAI HIRABHAI PAGI Advocate - J H THAKOR — 189/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJLV020002992026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
189/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
189/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAYLIBEN SOMABHAI HIRABHAI PAGI Advocate - J H THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court's Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 271 (Gujarat Prohibition Act) and Section 65 of the Gujarat Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, as the evidence—particularly witness testimony and documentation—was insufficient and contradictory to prove the alleged offense of possessing country liquor without authorization. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: the five panchas (witnesses) did not consistently corroborate the findings, the investigation lacked proper documentation of the alleged plastic container and seized alcohol, and the police investigation appeared incomplete. The court emphasized that without reliable witness testimony and proper documentary evidence, the presumption of innocence favors the accused under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court's Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 271 (Gujarat Prohibition Act) and Section 65 of the Gujarat Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, as the evidence—particularly witness testimony and documentation—was insufficient and contradictory to prove the alleged offense of possessing country liquor without authorization. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: the five panchas (witnesses) did not consistently corroborate the findings, the investigation lacked proper documentation of the alleged plastic container and seized alcohol, and the police investigation appeared incomplete. The court emphasized that without reliable witness testimony and proper documentary evidence, the presumption of innocence favors the accused under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts