Government of Gujarat vs RAYLIBEN SOMABHAI HIRABHAI PAGI Advocate - J H THAKOR — 189/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020002992026

Filing Number

189/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

189/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAYLIBEN SOMABHAI HIRABHAI PAGI Advocate - J H THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary Court's Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 271 (Gujarat Prohibition Act) and Section 65 of the Gujarat Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, as the evidence—particularly witness testimony and documentation—was insufficient and contradictory to prove the alleged offense of possessing country liquor without authorization. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: the five panchas (witnesses) did not consistently corroborate the findings, the investigation lacked proper documentation of the alleged plastic container and seized alcohol, and the police investigation appeared incomplete. The court emphasized that without reliable witness testimony and proper documentary evidence, the presumption of innocence favors the accused under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 189/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court's Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 271 (Gujarat Prohibition Act) and Section 65 of the Gujarat Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, as the evidence—particularly witness testimony and documentation—was insufficient and contradictory to prove the alleged offense of possessing country liquor without authorization. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: the five panchas (witnesses) did not consistently corroborate the findings, the investigation lacked proper documentation of the alleged plastic container and seized alcohol, and the police investigation appeared incomplete. The court emphasized that without reliable witness testimony and proper documentary evidence, the presumption of innocence favors the accused under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case