Government of Gujarat vs RAYLIBEN SOMABHAI HIRABHAI PAGI Advocate - J H THAKOR — 189/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020002992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

189/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

189/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAYLIBEN SOMABHAI HIRABHAI PAGI Advocate - J H THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

02-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

23-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary Court's Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 271 (Gujarat Prohibition Act) and Section 65 of the Gujarat Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, as the evidence—particularly witness testimony and documentation—was insufficient and contradictory to prove the alleged offense of possessing country liquor without authorization. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: the five panchas (witnesses) did not consistently corroborate the findings, the investigation lacked proper documentation of the alleged plastic container and seized alcohol, and the police investigation appeared incomplete. The court emphasized that without reliable witness testimony and proper documentary evidence, the presumption of innocence favors the accused under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court's Decision: The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 271 (Gujarat Prohibition Act) and Section 65 of the Gujarat Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused, as the evidence—particularly witness testimony and documentation—was insufficient and contradictory to prove the alleged offense of possessing country liquor without authorization. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case: the five panchas (witnesses) did not consistently corroborate the findings, the investigation lacked proper documentation of the alleged plastic container and seized alcohol, and the police investigation appeared incomplete. The court emphasized that without reliable witness testimony and proper documentary evidence, the presumption of innocence favors the accused under criminal jurisprudence principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case