Government of Gujarat vs KALIBEN RAMESHBHAI KHATUBHAI PAGI Advocate - R K BHOI — 187/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020002972026

Filing Number

187/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALIBEN RAMESHBHAI KHATUBHAI PAGI Advocate - R K BHOI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 271 and Gujarat Excise Act Section 65 in a case involving illegal possession of foreign liquor. The judgment found that while the prosecution's case appeared prima facie against the accused, the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence during investigation and examination, as the panchnama witnesses could not substantiate the seizure proceedings and police testimony lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused under IPC Section 271 and Gujarat Excise Act Section 65 in a case involving illegal possession of foreign liquor. The judgment found that while the prosecution's case appeared prima facie against the accused, the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence during investigation and examination, as the panchnama witnesses could not substantiate the seizure proceedings and police testimony lacked corroboration from independent witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case