Government of Gujarat vs BHIKHABHAI DHULABHAI PAGI — 186/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020002962026

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

186/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIKHABHAI DHULABHAI PAGI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Court Decision Summary This is a criminal case (C.C. No. 186/2026) from a Gujarat magistrate court regarding alleged possession of illegal country liquor. The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural deficiencies in the investigation and lack of credible witness testimony, ordering destruction of the seized contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 186/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary This is a criminal case (C.C. No. 186/2026) from a Gujarat magistrate court regarding alleged possession of illegal country liquor. The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical procedural deficiencies in the investigation and lack of credible witness testimony, ordering destruction of the seized contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case