Government of Gujarat vs SANGITABEN BHAGABHAI RAYSINGBHAI PATELIYA — 112/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020002022026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

112/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SANGITABEN BHAGABHAI RAYSINGBHAI PATELIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

26-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

17-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Lunaywada Magistrate Court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence that the defendant illegally possessed and stored 0.4 liters of country liquor without proper permits at his residence. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt due to procedural irregularities, lack of credible witness testimony, and inadequate documentary evidence supporting the guilt of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Lunaywada Magistrate Court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence that the defendant illegally possessed and stored 0.4 liters of country liquor without proper permits at his residence. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt due to procedural irregularities, lack of credible witness testimony, and inadequate documentary evidence supporting the guilt of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case