Government of Gujarat vs SANGITABEN BHAGABHAI RAYSINGBHAI PATELIYA — 112/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJLV020002022026

Filing Number

112/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LUNAWADA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGITABEN BHAGABHAI RAYSINGBHAI PATELIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Lunaywada Magistrate Court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence that the defendant illegally possessed and stored 0.4 liters of country liquor without proper permits at his residence. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt due to procedural irregularities, lack of credible witness testimony, and inadequate documentary evidence supporting the guilt of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Lunaywada Magistrate Court acquitted the accused of charges under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, finding insufficient evidence that the defendant illegally possessed and stored 0.4 liters of country liquor without proper permits at his residence. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt due to procedural irregularities, lack of credible witness testimony, and inadequate documentary evidence supporting the guilt of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case