JALAJ BHARATBHAI DAVE vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 134/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJLV010008552026

Filing Number

134/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

134/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

District Court, Mahisagar

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11187008250539

Police Station

VIRPUR POLICE STATION - MAHISAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JALAJ BHARATBHAI DAVE

    Adv. J N SHEIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Jalaj Bharatbhai Dave v. State of Gujarat (134/2026) Decision: The court rejected the petitioner Jalaj Bharatbhai Dave's bail application under CrPC Section 482. The petitioner was accused of cybercrime and operating fraudulent "mule accounts" involving transfers of ₹14,31,690.99 across multiple banks via IMPS/NEFT. Evidence indicated the petitioner played a significant role in the scheme; the court found that granting bail at this stage would impede the investigation and allow destruction of crucial digital evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jalaj Bharatbhai Dave v. State of Gujarat (134/2026) Decision: The court rejected the petitioner Jalaj Bharatbhai Dave's bail application under CrPC Section 482. The petitioner was accused of cybercrime and operating fraudulent "mule accounts" involving transfers of ₹14,31,690.99 across multiple banks via IMPS/NEFT. Evidence indicated the petitioner played a significant role in the scheme; the court found that granting bail at this stage would impede the investigation and allow destruction of crucial digital evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case