MOHSIN ABDUL LATIF ABDUL FARID SHEKH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 127/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJLV010008482026
Filing Number
127/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
127/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
District Court, Mahisagar
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11187012250011
Police Station
CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - MAHISAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHSIN ABDUL LATIF ABDUL FARID SHEKH
Adv. A I PATHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary Case 127/2026 - Mohsin Abdul Latif Abdul Farid Shekh v. The State of Gujarat The Sessions Court rejected the petitioner's bail application under Cr.P.C. Section 483. The petitioner was charged with online fraud involving Rs. 4,10,02,096 deposited into a trust account through coordinated deception with co-conspirators. Despite arguments of innocence and no criminal history, the court found prima facie evidence of the petitioner's involvement in meeting with other accused, coordinating bank account access, and engaging in 95+ phone contacts with key conspirators during the fraud period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2026
Case Summary Case 127/2026 - Mohsin Abdul Latif Abdul Farid Shekh v. The State of Gujarat The Sessions Court rejected the petitioner's bail application under Cr.P.C. Section 483. The petitioner was charged with online fraud involving Rs. 4,10,02,096 deposited into a trust account through coordinated deception with co-conspirators. Despite arguments of innocence and no criminal history, the court found prima facie evidence of the petitioner's involvement in meeting with other accused, coordinating bank account access, and engaging in 95+ phone contacts with key conspirators during the fraud period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts