JAYDIPSINH URFE LALO AMARSINH CHAUHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 111/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJLV010005852026

Filing Number

111/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

111/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

District Court, Mahisagar

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYDIPSINH URFE LALO AMARSINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. V R PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: The Lunavada Sessions Court granted regular bail to the applicant, Jaydip Singh (alias Lalo) Amarsingh Chauhan, in a case involving charges under the Prohibition Act and BNS sections. The court found that while a prima facie case exists, the applicant had a permanent residence in the jurisdiction, no criminal history, and another co-accused had already been granted bail, warranting extension of the same benefit. Bail was granted on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including monthly police reporting, non-tampering with witnesses, and maintaining presence during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Lunavada Sessions Court granted regular bail to the applicant, Jaydip Singh (alias Lalo) Amarsingh Chauhan, in a case involving charges under the Prohibition Act and BNS sections. The court found that while a prima facie case exists, the applicant had a permanent residence in the jurisdiction, no criminal history, and another co-accused had already been granted bail, warranting extension of the same benefit. Bail was granted on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including monthly police reporting, non-tampering with witnesses, and maintaining presence during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case