JAYDIPSINH URFE LALO AMARSINH CHAUHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 111/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJLV010005852026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
111/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
111/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
District Court, Mahisagar
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYDIPSINH URFE LALO AMARSINH CHAUHAN
Adv. V R PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Lunavada Sessions Court granted regular bail to the applicant, Jaydip Singh (alias Lalo) Amarsingh Chauhan, in a case involving charges under the Prohibition Act and BNS sections. The court found that while a prima facie case exists, the applicant had a permanent residence in the jurisdiction, no criminal history, and another co-accused had already been granted bail, warranting extension of the same benefit. Bail was granted on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including monthly police reporting, non-tampering with witnesses, and maintaining presence during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Lunavada Sessions Court granted regular bail to the applicant, Jaydip Singh (alias Lalo) Amarsingh Chauhan, in a case involving charges under the Prohibition Act and BNS sections. The court found that while a prima facie case exists, the applicant had a permanent residence in the jurisdiction, no criminal history, and another co-accused had already been granted bail, warranting extension of the same benefit. Bail was granted on a bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including monthly police reporting, non-tampering with witnesses, and maintaining presence during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts