MANILAL SANKARBHAI MACHHI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP — 110/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJLV010005742026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

110/2026

Filing Date

28-02-2026

Registration No

110/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Court

District Court, Mahisagar

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

MANILAL SANKARBHAI MACHHI

Adv. V L SAMBHVANI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

06-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER

03-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Lunavada (Mahisagar District) granted regular bail to applicant Manilal Shankarbhai Machi under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The court found that investigation into charges under BNS Sections 121(1), 221, 226, 84, and 296(B) and GP Act Section 135 was complete, and bail was warranted given that co-accused were already released on bail. The applicant was ordered to furnish Rs. 25,000 bail and execute a personal recognizance bond with six stringent conditions, including monthly police station reporting, non-tampering with witnesses, and maintaining residence in India until trial concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Lunavada (Mahisagar District) granted regular bail to applicant Manilal Shankarbhai Machi under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure, 2023. The court found that investigation into charges under BNS Sections 121(1), 221, 226, 84, and 296(B) and GP Act Section 135 was complete, and bail was warranted given that co-accused were already released on bail. The applicant was ordered to furnish Rs. 25,000 bail and execute a personal recognizance bond with six stringent conditions, including monthly police station reporting, non-tampering with witnesses, and maintaining residence in India until trial concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Mahisagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case