THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHAILESHBHAI FULABHAI VARJIBHAI TAVIYAD Advocate - J S PANDYA — 2/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)M,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE-PCSO

CNR: GJLV010002092025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2/2025

Filing Date

14-02-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

14-02-2025

Court

District Court, Mahisagar

Judge

2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)M,
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 4,5(L),6,

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. C G JOSHI

Respondent(s)

SHAILESHBHAI FULABHAI VARJIBHAI TAVIYAD Advocate - J S PANDYA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

18-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

02-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Court Decision Court: Special POCSO Court, Lunawada, Mahisagar District, Gujarat Case: Special POCSO Case No. 02/2025 Decision: The accused, Shaileshbhai Fulabhai Taviyad, age 19, was acquitted of all charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act Sections 4, 5(L), and 6. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rape and abduction charges against the victim (a 16-year-old girl). The judgment was delivered on March 7, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision Court: Special POCSO Court, Lunawada, Mahisagar District, Gujarat Case: Special POCSO Case No. 02/2025 Decision: The accused, Shaileshbhai Fulabhai Taviyad, age 19, was acquitted of all charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act Sections 4, 5(L), and 6. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rape and abduction charges against the victim (a 16-year-old girl). The judgment was delivered on March 7, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court, Mahisagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case