THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHAILESHBHAI FULABHAI VARJIBHAI TAVIYAD Advocate - J S PANDYA — 2/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)M. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE-PCSO

CNR: GJLV010002092025

Filing Number

2/2025

Filing Date

14-Feb-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

14-Feb-2025

Court

District Court, Mahisagar

Judge

2-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)M
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,5(L),6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. C G JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAILESHBHAI FULABHAI VARJIBHAI TAVIYAD Advocate - J S PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision Court: Special POCSO Court, Lunawada, Mahisagar District, Gujarat Case: Special POCSO Case No. 02/2025 Decision: The accused, Shaileshbhai Fulabhai Taviyad, age 19, was acquitted of all charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act Sections 4, 5(L), and 6. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rape and abduction charges against the victim (a 16-year-old girl). The judgment was delivered on March 7, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  13. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  15. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  16. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  17. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  18. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  19. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  20. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  21. 30-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  22. 16-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  23. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  24. 18-Apr-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  25. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence For Charge

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  26. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence For Charge

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence For Charge

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  28. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence For Charge

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  29. 24-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 14-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision Court: Special POCSO Court, Lunawada, Mahisagar District, Gujarat Case: Special POCSO Case No. 02/2025 Decision: The accused, Shaileshbhai Fulabhai Taviyad, age 19, was acquitted of all charges under BNS Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(M) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act Sections 4, 5(L), and 6. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rape and abduction charges against the victim (a 16-year-old girl). The judgment was delivered on March 7, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case