VIJAYBHAI RAYDHANBHAI KOLI- USETIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 269/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 29th May 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKT180005022026
Filing Number
269/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
269/2026
Registration Date
21-May-2026
Court
ADDL. COURT-BHACHAU
Judge
2-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993001240155
Police Station
SAMAKHIYALI POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAYBHAI RAYDHANBHAI KOLI- USETIYA
Adv. V D KOTAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: CRMA No. 269/2026 Vijaybhai Raydhanbhai Koli sought interim bail under BNS Section 483, citing his mother's poor health requiring his care and approximately 2 years of custody. The court rejected the bail application, finding the accusations under serious charges (IPC Sections 302, 307, 324, 325, and others) credible and noting the accused's pattern of repeatedly filing bail petitions. The court determined insufficient grounds for bail given prosecution evidence, witness testimony, and risk of misuse of liberty, ordering the accused to remain in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
27-May-2026
Order
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-May-2026
Order
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 269/2026
Case Summary: CRMA No. 269/2026 Vijaybhai Raydhanbhai Koli sought interim bail under BNS Section 483, citing his mother's poor health requiring his care and approximately 2 years of custody. The court rejected the bail application, finding the accusations under serious charges (IPC Sections 302, 307, 324, 325, and others) credible and noting the accused's pattern of repeatedly filing bail petitions. The court determined insufficient grounds for bail given prosecution evidence, witness testimony, and risk of misuse of liberty, ordering the accused to remain in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts