NAGJIBHAI - JIGAR -JIGO DHINGABHAI KOLI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 267/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT180005002026

Filing Number

267/2026

Filing Date

20-May-2026

Registration No

267/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-BHACHAU

Judge

2-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

27-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993011260090

Police Station

LAKADIYA POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 305,331(4),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGJIBHAI - JIGAR -JIGO DHINGABHAI KOLI

    Adv. R T RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-May-2026

    Order

    The Second Additional Sessions Judge, Kachchh rejected bail for 21-year-old Nagji Koli, accused of theft of copper wires worth ₹1,38,600 from two windmills in a pre-planned conspiracy. The court found prima facie evidence of his direct involvement, noted his two prior criminal antecedents, and determined that releasing him on bail posed a likelihood of reoffending, warranting continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    Order

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 25-May-2026

    Process To Respondents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 22-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 267/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Second Additional Sessions Judge, Kachchh rejected bail for 21-year-old Nagji Koli, accused of theft of copper wires worth ₹1,38,600 from two windmills in a pre-planned conspiracy. The court found prima facie evidence of his direct involvement, noted his two prior criminal antecedents, and determined that releasing him on bail posed a likelihood of reoffending, warranting continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case