DHUDARAM BANKARAM vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 127/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 451. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT180002782026

Filing Number

127/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

127/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-BHACHAU

Judge

2-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

125

Police Station

BHACHAU POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 451
Indian Penal Code Section 394,397,336,114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHUDARAM BANKARAM

    Adv. D R VAGHELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court granted the applicant Dhudaram Bankaram's petition under CrPC Section 451 for return of seized cash of ₹17,700. The court found that since the applicant provided proper bail and surety, and no other party claimed the amount, returning the cash with interest on proper security was justified and legally appropriate. The court ordered the release of the seized amount with interest to the applicant upon submission of adequate bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted the applicant Dhudaram Bankaram's petition under CrPC Section 451 for return of seized cash of ₹17,700. The court found that since the applicant provided proper bail and surety, and no other party claimed the amount, returning the cash with interest on proper security was justified and legally appropriate. The court ordered the release of the seized amount with interest to the applicant upon submission of adequate bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case