M/S. KARAM BHAKTI TIMBERS PROP KISHORBHAI DAYABHAI PATEL (LIMBANI) vs M/S. KASTURBA IMPEX PROP JENTILAL HANSRAJ PATEL — 177/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT150004682026

Filing Number

177/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

177/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

6-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. KARAM BHAKTI TIMBERS PROP KISHORBHAI DAYABHAI PATEL (LIMBANI)

    Adv. C K PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. KASTURBA IMPEX PROP JENTILAL HANSRAJ PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhidham-Kachchh allowed the delay condonation application and permitted Kirshorbhai Dayabhai Patel to file a criminal appeal against the January 23, 2025 conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, despite a 380-day delay. The court found the reasons genuine—the applicant was arrested and in judicial custody when the judgment was pronounced and wasn't informed by his advocate—and ordered the applicant to pay ₹20,000 costs to the complainant before the appeal registration proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhidham-Kachchh allowed the delay condonation application and permitted Kirshorbhai Dayabhai Patel to file a criminal appeal against the January 23, 2025 conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, despite a 380-day delay. The court found the reasons genuine—the applicant was arrested and in judicial custody when the judgment was pronounced and wasn't informed by his advocate—and ordered the applicant to pay ₹20,000 costs to the complainant before the appeal registration proceeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case