ALPESH SURESHBHAI LUHAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP — 176/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT150004672026

Filing Number

176/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

176/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

6-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993016260002

Police Station

GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALPESH SURESHBHAI LUHAR

    Adv. C J DHARAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Gandhinagar Sessions Court rejected the accused Alpesh Sureshbhai Luhar's bail application in a serious cybercrime and online fraud case involving Rs. 1.82 crore. The court found sufficient grounds for the accusations of conspiracy, money laundering, and cyber fraud under various IPC and IT Act sections, noting the organized nature of the crime and the accused's key role in facilitating illegal online transactions and bank account operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 176/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gandhinagar Sessions Court rejected the accused Alpesh Sureshbhai Luhar's bail application in a serious cybercrime and online fraud case involving Rs. 1.82 crore. The court found sufficient grounds for the accusations of conspiracy, money laundering, and cyber fraud under various IPC and IT Act sections, noting the organized nature of the crime and the accused's key role in facilitating illegal online transactions and bank account operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case