SAHIL DINESHBHAI SHARMA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P — 173/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT150004632026

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

6-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993016260002

Police Station

GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(2),316(5),318(4),340(2),61(2),3(5)
Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66(C),66(D)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHIL DINESHBHAI SHARMA

    Adv. C J DHARAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court granted bail to the accused in a case involving serious fraud charges under IPC Sections 316, 316(5), 318(4), 340(2), 238, 61(2), 3(5) and ITA 66(c), 66(d). The court ordered the accused's release on land bail after finding that while the charges were grave and involved organized online fraud across multiple bank accounts, the investigation was substantially complete, and the accused's custodial detention was no longer necessary to secure his presence during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court granted bail to the accused in a case involving serious fraud charges under IPC Sections 316, 316(5), 318(4), 340(2), 238, 61(2), 3(5) and ITA 66(c), 66(d). The court ordered the accused's release on land bail after finding that while the charges were grave and involved organized online fraud across multiple bank accounts, the investigation was substantially complete, and the accused's custodial detention was no longer necessary to secure his presence during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case