MAHMAD SAJID S/O NABBI HUSEN ANSARI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP — 172/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT150004622026

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

172/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

6-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993006260001

Police Station

A DIVISION POLICE STATION GANDHIDHAM - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64,64(2)(M),351(2),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHMAD SAJID S/O NABBI HUSEN ANSARI

    Adv. R T LALCHANDANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Gandhinagar District Court granted bail to the accused in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 64, 64(2)(a), 351(2), 351(3), and 483, finding that while serious allegations of coercion, physical abuse, and extortion were made, the investigation was incomplete and the accused had been in custody long enough. The court ordered bail subject to conditions including a personal bond and restrictions on contact with the victim, emphasizing that bail decisions must balance the gravity of charges against the right to liberty while ensuring the accused appears for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gandhinagar District Court granted bail to the accused in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 64, 64(2)(a), 351(2), 351(3), and 483, finding that while serious allegations of coercion, physical abuse, and extortion were made, the investigation was incomplete and the accused had been in custody long enough. The court ordered bail subject to conditions including a personal bond and restrictions on contact with the victim, emphasizing that bail decisions must balance the gravity of charges against the right to liberty while ensuring the accused appears for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case