MAHMAD SAJID S/O NABBI HUSEN ANSARI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP — 172/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKT150004622026
Filing Number
172/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM
Judge
6-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11993006260001
Police Station
A DIVISION POLICE STATION GANDHIDHAM - KACHCHH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHMAD SAJID S/O NABBI HUSEN ANSARI
Adv. R T LALCHANDANI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP
Hearing History
Judge: 6-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 11-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Gandhinagar District Court granted bail to the accused in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 64, 64(2)(a), 351(2), 351(3), and 483, finding that while serious allegations of coercion, physical abuse, and extortion were made, the investigation was incomplete and the accused had been in custody long enough. The court ordered bail subject to conditions including a personal bond and restrictions on contact with the victim, emphasizing that bail decisions must balance the gravity of charges against the right to liberty while ensuring the accused appears for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gandhinagar District Court granted bail to the accused in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 64, 64(2)(a), 351(2), 351(3), and 483, finding that while serious allegations of coercion, physical abuse, and extortion were made, the investigation was incomplete and the accused had been in custody long enough. The court ordered bail subject to conditions including a personal bond and restrictions on contact with the victim, emphasizing that bail decisions must balance the gravity of charges against the right to liberty while ensuring the accused appears for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts