SHIVJIBHAI LAKHUBHAI BAVA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP — 169/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT150004302026

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

11-9th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993006260228

Police Station

A DIVISION POLICE STATION GANDHIDHAM - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),221,285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVJIBHAI LAKHUBHAI BAVA

    Adv. R T LALCHANDANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Gujarat High Court granted bail to the accused in a case involving theft of cement and related charges under IPC sections 303(2), 221, and 285. The court found that while serious charges existed, the investigation was at a preliminary stage, and the accused's continued detention would prejudice the ongoing inquiry. Considering the accused's local residence, cooperation potential, and absence of risk of absconding, the court ordered interim bail with conditions pending further investigation and trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    9th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    9th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    9th Addl District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court granted bail to the accused in a case involving theft of cement and related charges under IPC sections 303(2), 221, and 285. The court found that while serious charges existed, the investigation was at a preliminary stage, and the accused's continued detention would prejudice the ongoing inquiry. Considering the accused's local residence, cooperation potential, and absence of risk of absconding, the court ordered interim bail with conditions pending further investigation and trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case