SHIVJIBHAI LAKHUBHAI BAVA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP — 169/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT150004302026

Case disposed

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

11-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11993006260228

Police Station

A DIVISION POLICE STATION GANDHIDHAM - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 303(2),221,285

Petitioner(s)

SHIVJIBHAI LAKHUBHAI BAVA

Adv. R T LALCHANDANI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 11-9th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

ORDER

11-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Gujarat High Court granted bail to the accused in a case involving theft of cement and related charges under IPC sections 303(2), 221, and 285. The court found that while serious charges existed, the investigation was at a preliminary stage, and the accused's continued detention would prejudice the ongoing inquiry. Considering the accused's local residence, cooperation potential, and absence of risk of absconding, the court ordered interim bail with conditions pending further investigation and trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court granted bail to the accused in a case involving theft of cement and related charges under IPC sections 303(2), 221, and 285. The court found that while serious charges existed, the investigation was at a preliminary stage, and the accused's continued detention would prejudice the ongoing inquiry. Considering the accused's local residence, cooperation potential, and absence of risk of absconding, the court ordered interim bail with conditions pending further investigation and trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case