KANAIYA S/O. BHIMSHIBHAI GADHVI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP — 148/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)(B). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT150003602026

Filing Number

148/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

148/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

6-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11994004260005

Police Station

GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

1.KANAIYA S/O. BHIMSHIBHAI GADHVI

Adv. V N GADHAVI

Respondent(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P Advocate - AGP

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
18-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

Court Decision Summary This Gujarat High Court judgment modified a lower court order regarding a military officer's service conditions. The court partially allowed the officer's petition, striking down Condition No. 7 that restricted him from leaving Gujarat state without government permission, while upholding other conditions requiring military cooperation and presence during trial proceedings. The court reasoned that while the officer must remain available for trial, an absolute territorial restriction on his movements by a single state was inappropriate given his status as an Indian Army serviceman who could be transferred to other states under military regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
18-Mar-2026

Disposed

4th Addl District Judge
17-Mar-2026

Order

4th Addl District Judge
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
28-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary This Gujarat High Court judgment modified a lower court order regarding a military officer's service conditions. The court partially allowed the officer's petition, striking down Condition No. 7 that restricted him from leaving Gujarat state without government permission, while upholding other conditions requiring military cooperation and presence during trial proceedings. The court reasoned that while the officer must remain available for trial, an absolute territorial restriction on his movements by a single state was inappropriate given his status as an Indian Army serviceman who could be transferred to other states under military regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.