RAMANI JAGDISH LAKHMAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P — 139/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)(B). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKT150003482026

Filing Number

139/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

139/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

ADJ COURT, GANDHIDHAM

Judge

6-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11994004260005

Police Station

GANDHIDHAM POLICE STATION - KACHCHH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMANI JAGDISH LAKHMAN

    Adv. N A GADHAVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH A.G.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary This is a Gujarat High Court judgment in Gujarati regarding a military officer's petition against an order imposing condition (7) on his land allotment, which restricted him from leaving Gujarat without permission. The court approved the removal of this restrictive condition, recognizing that the officer's military service requirements may necessitate transfers to other states, and that such restrictions violate principles of natural justice and the officer's rights to employment mobility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 139/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Gujarat High Court judgment in Gujarati regarding a military officer's petition against an order imposing condition (7) on his land allotment, which restricted him from leaving Gujarat without permission. The court approved the removal of this restrictive condition, recognizing that the officer's military service requirements may necessitate transfers to other states, and that such restrictions violate principles of natural justice and the officer's rights to employment mobility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case