STATE THROUGHT H M PATEL, LABOUR OFFICER AND INSPECTOR OF MINIMUM WAGES ACR 1948 vs SIDDHARTH RAMAN AMIN, DIRECTOR OF DR. AMIN CONTROLERS PVT. LTD. — 168/2025

Case under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 22,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 09th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKT140003312025

Case disposed

Filing Number

168/2025

Filing Date

21-08-2025

Registration No

168/2025

Registration Date

21-08-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, BHUJ

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948 Section 22,A

Petitioner(s)

STATE THROUGHT H M PATEL, LABOUR OFFICER AND INSPECTOR OF MINIMUM WAGES ACR 1948

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SIDDHARTH RAMAN AMIN, DIRECTOR OF DR. AMIN CONTROLERS PVT. LTD.

VIKHAR RAMAN AMIN, DIRECTOR OF DR. AMIN CONTROLERS PVT. LTD.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE

09-04-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

16-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary In Criminal Case No. 168/2025, the Gandhinagar Labor Court convicted Dr. Amin Controllers Pvt. Ltd. and its directors (Siddharth Raman Amin and Vikram Raman Amin) of violations under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Sections 22 and related provisions). The court found that the company violated minimum wage regulations during an inspection on June 5, 2025. The defendants pleaded guilty and admitted to the charges voluntarily. The court sentenced the company to a fine of ₹36,000 (₹12,000 per violation per defendant) and imposed an alternative imprisonment of 30 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Case No. 168/2025, the Gandhinagar Labor Court convicted Dr. Amin Controllers Pvt. Ltd. and its directors (Siddharth Raman Amin and Vikram Raman Amin) of violations under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (Sections 22 and related provisions). The court found that the company violated minimum wage regulations during an inspection on June 5, 2025. The defendants pleaded guilty and admitted to the charges voluntarily. The court sentenced the company to a fine of ₹36,000 (₹12,000 per violation per defendant) and imposed an alternative imprisonment of 30 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, BHUJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case