BHACHIBAI W/O NURMAMAD NAYDA vs LATE ALANA BHACHAL SUMRA — 20/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37,38. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT130005762025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
20/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHAVDA
Judge
1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHACHIBAI W/O NURMAMAD NAYDA
Adv. A I KURESHI
ISMAIL NURMAMAD NAGDA
Adv. A I KURESHI
HUSHEN NURMAMAD NAGDA
Adv. A I KURESHI
MAMAD NURMAMAD NAGDA
Adv. A I KURESHI
Respondent(s)
LATE ALANA BHACHAL SUMRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
HEARING
ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 15-04-2026 | ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Summary Case: RCS 20/2025 - Civil suit regarding agricultural land ownership and interim injunction application Outcome: The plaintiff's application for interim injunction (stay order) under CPC Order 39 Rule 1 and Section 151 was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case, as the land in question was allegedly sold in 1968 and the plaintiff's claim was being raised approximately 50 years later, which constitutes unreasonable delay in seeking equitable relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case: RCS 20/2025 - Civil suit regarding agricultural land ownership and interim injunction application Outcome: The plaintiff's application for interim injunction (stay order) under CPC Order 39 Rule 1 and Section 151 was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case, as the land in question was allegedly sold in 1968 and the plaintiff's claim was being raised approximately 50 years later, which constitutes unreasonable delay in seeking equitable relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts