BHACHIBAI W/O NURMAMAD NAYDA vs LATE ALANA BHACHAL SUMRA — 20/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,37,38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKT130005762025
Filing Number
20/2025
Filing Date
14-Nov-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
14-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHAVDA
Judge
1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHACHIBAI W/O NURMAMAD NAYDA
Adv. A I KURESHI
-
2.ISMAIL NURMAMAD NAGDA
Adv. A I KURESHI
-
3.HUSHEN NURMAMAD NAGDA
Adv. A I KURESHI
-
4.MAMAD NURMAMAD NAGDA
Adv. A I KURESHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.LATE ALANA BHACHAL SUMRA
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary Case: RCS 20/2025 - Civil suit regarding agricultural land ownership and interim injunction application Outcome: The plaintiff's application for interim injunction (stay order) under CPC Order 39 Rule 1 and Section 151 was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case, as the land in question was allegedly sold in 1968 and the plaintiff's claim was being raised approximately 50 years later, which constitutes unreasonable delay in seeking equitable relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Order On Injuction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2025
Summary Case: RCS 20/2025 - Civil suit regarding agricultural land ownership and interim injunction application Outcome: The plaintiff's application for interim injunction (stay order) under CPC Order 39 Rule 1 and Section 151 was dismissed/rejected. The court found that the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case, as the land in question was allegedly sold in 1968 and the plaintiff's claim was being raised approximately 50 years later, which constitutes unreasonable delay in seeking equitable relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts