NODE BAMBHANIYA ALANA vs VALIYANIBAI MAMAD NODE Advocate - A H LODHIA — 28/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKT130001752024

Filing Number

28/2024

Filing Date

19-Aug-2015

Registration No

28/2024

Registration Date

19-Aug-2015

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHAVDA

Judge

1-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NODE BAMBHANIYA ALANA

    Adv. M H RATHOD

  2. 2.LATE KARIMABAI D/O ALANA NODE(Legal Heir)

    Adv. M H RATHOD2.

  3. 3.NODE HUSEN ISMAIL

    Adv. M H RATHOD2.

  4. 4.NODE HAJRABAI ISMAIL

    Adv. M H RATHOD2.

  5. 5.NODE ABDULLA ISMAIL

    Adv. M H RATHOD2.

  6. 6.NODE MAMAD ISMAIL

    Adv. M H RATHOD2.

  7. 7.NODE DOSABAI ISMAIL

    Adv. M H RATHOD2.

  8. 8.NODE RESHMABAI ISMAIL

    Adv. M H RATHOD

  9. 9.PURBAI D/O ALAN NODE

    Adv. M H RATHOD

  10. 10.MIRA ALANA BAMBHANIYA NODE

    Adv. M H RATHOD4.

  11. 11.MIYABAI W/O MIRA NODE

    Adv. M H RATHOD4.

  12. 12.HANIF MIRA NODE

    Adv. M H RATHOD4.

  13. 13.RASHIDA MIRA NODE T/H MIYABAI W/O MIRA NODE

    Adv. M H RATHOD4.

  14. 14.RASHID MIRA NODE T/H MIYABAI W/O MIRA NODE

    Adv. M H RATHOD4.

  15. 15.FATMABAI MIRA NODE T/H MIYABAI W/O MIRA NODE

    Adv. M H RATHOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VALIYANIBAI MAMAD NODE Advocate - A H LODHIA

  2. 2.AASHIYATBAI DINA NODE

  3. 3.HAVABAI TAMACHI NODE

  4. 4.MUKIMABAI TAMACHI NODE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Khavda dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking to set aside a prior compromise decree and declare ownership of agricultural land. The court held that the suit was not maintainable under Order XXIII Rule 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which bars separate suits challenging compromise decrees—such challenges must be raised before the original court that recorded the compromise, not through a new declaratory suit. Despite the plaintiffs' allegations of fraud and misrepresentation in obtaining the earlier compromise, their own admissions during cross-examination established their participation in compromise proceedings and consent before the court, making the present suit a barred collateral attack on the prior decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 18-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 05-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 24-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 19-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 17-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 10-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 05-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 04-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 28-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 13-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 05-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 31-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 17-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 11-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 06-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 01-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 17-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 14-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 29-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 13-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 01-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 09-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 26-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 13-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 13-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 16-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 06-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 14-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 14-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 23-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 03-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 29-Jun-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 30-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 19-Aug-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Khavda dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking to set aside a prior compromise decree and declare ownership of agricultural land. The court held that the suit was not maintainable under Order XXIII Rule 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which bars separate suits challenging compromise decrees—such challenges must be raised before the original court that recorded the compromise, not through a new declaratory suit. Despite the plaintiffs' allegations of fraud and misrepresentation in obtaining the earlier compromise, their own admissions during cross-examination established their participation in compromise proceedings and consent before the court, making the present suit a barred collateral attack on the prior decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case